Post-Beloved Writing
Review, Revitalize, Recalculate
| dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage | 37 | en_US |
| dc.bibliographicCitation.issue | 1 | en_US |
| dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage | 55 | en_US |
| dc.bibliographicCitation.volume | 1 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Misrahi-Barak, Judith | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-10T14:39:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-02-10T14:39:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Twenty-five years have elapsed since the publication of Beloved. In all its complexity, Toni Morrison’s novel forms a peak, both concluding the previous decades of neo-slave narratives and introducing the following ones. As the following article argues, reviewing the many ways the novel has closed a period and opened a new one will help us gain a new perspective and understand new articulations and developments in slavery literature. Misrahi-Barak contends that the genre of the neo-slave narrative has ceased to be African-American only, but has become transnational and global, dialogic, polyphonic and trans-generic. It has also been instrumental in implementing a rapprochement between disciplines that used to be watertight. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?fidaac-11858/2822 | |
| dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-00103775-17 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.relation.issn | 2198-7920 | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Black Studies Papers | en_US |
| dc.rights | L::CC BY-NC 4.0 | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | ddc:810 | en_US |
| dc.subject.field | americanstudies | en_US |
| dc.subject.field | literarystudies | en_US |
| dc.title | Post-Beloved Writing | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Review, Revitalize, Recalculate | en_US |
| dc.title.specialissue | Slavery Revisited | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en_US |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |